Overview
Are you tracking the right key performance indicators for your organization? We're all familiar with the Balanced Scorecard introduced by Kaplan and Norton in the 90's for tracking objectives. It is simply a tool used to evaluate, define, track and improve core business metrics over time, like a doctor who will measure blood pressure, temperature, reflex and symptoms before diving deeper into diagnosis. It's gone through several generational refinements over time to include a strategy mapping exercise which seeks to understand causal relationships between interconnected processes and then objective tracking for feedback and iterative improvement. While the core of the balanced scorecard has stood the test of time for providing performance visibility vertically and horizontally through the organization there may be more to consider than the traditional four perspective approach.
Boxing your Approach
When creating a balanced scorecard for your organization one of the first things to do is define time boxed objectives. By what percentage do we want to increase our gross revenue this quarter compared to last quarter? What is our customer churn rate year to date compared to the same period last year? As you might guess both of these examples are probably directly related to our primary objectives for the organization and in many cases overlap, either by department, process or initiative. The important part is that your objectives are translated into operation goals. Another factor to designing a robust balanced scorecard is horizontal adoption across the organization with each department's processes and metrics tied directly to the objectives and also vertically to the individual contributor level. Once the blueprint for the business processes are mapped then you begin to measure the speed and efficiency of the wheels turning the engine. As time goes on, you are then able to make iterative improvements to the engine, apply some oil here, change a spark plug there or even better, and determine which parts are moving effectively.
Balanced Scorecard
This brings us to the four perspectives of the traditional balanced scorecard; financial, customer, internal business processes and training and growth. Just as the whole organization will have key performance indicators that reside in these four quadrants so might each department, and may overlap both horizontally and vertically. The financial perspective is just as you might think, all about revenue, expenses, growth and profitability. These are mostly lagging indicators, those that measure past events since by the time they hit the balance sheet it's too late to do anything about them. Our customer perspective is all about our relationship with who buys the products, how they rate us and in some cases how we rate them perhaps in terms of risk or opportunity. Internal business processes can be measured in terms of how a department accomplishes their performance objectives such as completing projects or on time delivery but also how they interact with other departments and enabling their efficiency. Training and growth is at an organizational and individual level where we ask ourselves, how are seeking out new opportunities, are we continuing to innovate in our industry?
The Fifth Perspective
Which brings us to the fifth perspective. What makes you personally choose a BMW or a Lexus, a Tag Heuer or a Rolex? It's something in the brand that draws you to identify with the product or service. If you are a business owner you probably think a lot about competitive differentiation and how it aligns with your target customer and how to strengthen your position in the niche. But are you actually measuring this somewhat intangible asset? For example, BMW's mission statement is "The BMW brand stands for one thing: sheer driving pleasure. Sporting and dynamic performance combined with superb design and exclusive quality." Are there ways to quantify and measure "driving pleasure", "superb design" and "exclusive quality"? You bet there is and if I'm smart as an executive I'll be looking at competitive intelligence and 3rd party data to measure, compare and improve upon these qualities to reinforce my brand. For Tag Heuer their mission statement is, "Excellence, precision and elegance are the exacting standards and impassioned commitments engendering the fabulous TAG Heuer Swiss luxury watch collection." If I am the CEO I would be looking for ways to measure the more abstract terms such as "elegance", "impassioned commitments" or "engendering" and these would drive performance in the processes in the other four perspectives. In many ways the first four perspectives are very similar from business to business in an industry but measuring and improving the fifth perspective, which is in essence is your corporate mission statement, will reinforce the ability for your business to continue to be distinct and profitable with your target customers.
Turn the fifth perspective into a decision and measurement plan
Treat this fifth perspective as an extension for your organization's distinctive promise, not a replacement for the other four perspectives. A useful measure must connect that promise to an observable customer experience and an operating decision. A favorable survey response alone does not demonstrate profitable growth or explain what caused it.
Start with one promise and one decision
For a service organization that promises dependable delivery, begin with a concrete question: which recurring handoff should the operations manager change this month? Define dependable delivery in terms a customer can observe, such as completion by the originally agreed date. Keep the original date alongside any revised date so rescheduling cannot silently improve the result.
Illustrative measurement contract for a dependable-delivery promise| Element | Definition to agree |
|---|
| Decision owner | Operations manager, with a named data owner who can resolve missing or disputed records. |
|---|
| First measure | On-time completion rate: eligible cases completed by the original promised date divided by all eligible completed cases in the reporting period. |
|---|
| Source and grain | One row per completed case, with a stable case identifier, original promised date, completion date and agreed exclusions. |
|---|
| Balancing measures | Reopened cases, customer complaints and cost per completed case. Faster completion should not hide repeat work or rising delivery cost. |
|---|
| Action and review | Review exceptions by service type and handoff. Agree a response threshold from the baseline and operating constraints, then record the action and review date. |
|---|
Validate the baseline before building a dashboard
As a fictional arithmetic example, 72 on-time cases out of 90 eligible completed cases equals 80%. This is not an Ataira customer result or a recommended target. Document why other cases were excluded and report missing promised dates separately. Otherwise the headline rate can improve merely because difficult records disappeared from the denominator.
Reconcile the case count to the source system, inspect duplicate identifiers, agree the reporting timezone, and sample exceptions with the process owner. Compare equivalent periods and show the underlying counts alongside percentages. Changes in service mix, case complexity or recording practice can make two apparently similar percentages misleading.
Connect the result to a bounded analytics engagement
A first engagement can scope one decision, one source export and one reporting cycle. The useful deliverables are a KPI definition, source-to-measure mapping, reconciliation checks, exception view and owner-approved review process. A Power BI report can support this workflow once the data access and licensing requirements are confirmed; selecting a reporting product does not establish that the measure is trustworthy.
Use the next review to distinguish the action taken from the outcome observed. Record the baseline, action date, measurement window and competing explanations. Keep a proposed improvement separate from a deployed process change and from a measured result.
Request a scoped KPI and reporting readiness review to turn one strategic promise into an accountable measurement process.
Click here to see how Power BI analytics development can improve performance in your organization